The Pentagon has spent as much as $1.1 billion on U.S. military operations against Islamic State militants in Iraq and Syria since the mission began in mid-June, including more than $62 million alone on Navy airstrikes and Tomahawk cruise missiles.
News Agencies and Israel Hayom Staff
An Apache helicopter in Iraq [Illustrative]
|
Photo credit: Wikicommons |
The U.S. military deployed Apache helicopters against the Islamic State group in Iraq for the first time, exposing U.S. troops to greater risk from ground fire as they help Iraqi forces battle the Islamist group that has overrun parts of the country.
U.S. troops flew helicopters against Islamic State fighters on Sunday and again on Monday as they struck at mortar teams and other units near Fallujah, a spokesman for Central Command, which is responsible for U.S. forces in the Middle East, said.
"This was the first time rotary wing aircraft were used in coordination with and in support of ISF [Iraqi Security Force] operations," Army Major Curtis Kellogg said in an email. "The Iraqi government asked for support with this capability near Fallujah to push back [Islamic State]."
U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the helicopters that were used were Apache attack helicopters.
Richard Fontaine, president of the Center for a New American Security think tank, said the military's decision to use Apaches "demonstrates that they've only achieved limited results with the airstrikes from fighters and bombers and drones."
Christopher Harmer, a former U.S. Navy aviator who is an analyst at the Institute for the Study of War think tank, said it was a significant escalation in the level of risk being taken by U.S. troops assisting the Iraqi military.
"Fixed-wing aircraft flying at 30,000 feet [9,100 meters] are completely immune from the type of weapons that Islamic State fighters have, but a helicopter is not," Harmer said.
"When you're flying a helicopter 150 feet [46 meters] above the ground, that helicopter can be shot with a rocket-propelled grenade or a heavy machine gun. ... So, yes, it is much more dangerous," he added.
Army Colonel Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman, said the decision to use helicopters was taken because of the nature of the targets, but he did not offer details on who made the decision.
Harmer said helicopters would be much more effective at supporting Iraqi ground troops directly engaged in combat with Islamic State fighters because they fly lower and more slowly and are more capable of identifying individual targets.
"If you've got Iraqi army fighting against Islamic State fighters, it's much better to have helicopters supporting the Iraqi army than fixed-wing aircraft," he said.
Warren said the military considered the risk of flying helicopters before deploying them.
He rejected any notion that using helicopters amounted to mission creep. "The mission is still the same. This is using the correct tool for the job," Warren said.
But Fontaine disagreed, saying, "The mission has been creeping along from the very beginning."
He said the administration's effort to draw a line between putting combat troops on the ground in Iraq and providing air support for Iraqi forces was rapidly becoming "a distinction without a huge amount of difference."
"You know 1,600 troops in Iraq is boots on the ground, and airstrikes and helicopter assaults is combat," Fontaine said.
The Pentagon has spent as much as $1.1 billion on U.S. military operations against Islamic State militants in Iraq and Syria since the mission began in mid-June, including more than $62 million alone in navy airstrikes and Tomahawk cruise missiles.
U.S. Central Command, in data released Monday, said that the navy has dropped roughly 185 munitions, including 47 cruise missiles launched from ships in the region. Central Command said air force fighter jets have far exceeded those numbers, launching close to 1,000 munitions. The data released Monday broke out the $62 million spent on navy munitions, but provided no cost estimates for air force munitions.
The bulk of the navy costs were for the 47 Tomahawk cruise missiles fired by American warships in the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea that targeted the Khorasan Group, an al-Qaida cell, in eight locations west of the city of Aleppo in Syria. The group was said to be plotting imminent attacks on American and Western interests, and it was one of the key targets two weeks ago when the U.S. first began airstrikes into Syria.
The Pentagon has struggled to come up with specific cost figures for the Iraq and Syria operations. Officials say it has cost an average of $7 million to $10 million daily since June.
The costs of the operations began at a much lower rate in June then escalated as airstrikes began in northern Iraq on August 8. In late August, the Pentagon said the cost was an average of $7.5 million daily. The airstrikes were expanded to Syria in September, prompting the latest, higher average estimates.
There are currently more than 1,300 U.S. troops in Iraq, including security personnel, staff at two joint operations centers in Baghdad and Irbil, and advisory teams that are working with Iraqi brigades and headquarters units.
0 comments:
Post a Comment